Opinion
June 30, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.).
Ordered that the appeal from the order entered June 28, 1996, is dismissed, as that order was vacated by the order entered September 5, 1996; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from the order entered September 5, 1996, is dismissed, since an order which defers determination of a motion is not appealable as of right ( see, Oberting v Long Is. Jewish-Hillside Med. Ctr., 100 A.D.2d 840); and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated September 18, 1996, is reversed, on the law, the plaintiff's motion is denied, the defendant's cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,
Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.
It is well settled that a party attempting to vacate a default must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see, Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). In this case, the defendant asserted that under the circumstances, the plaintiff's exclusive remedy was Workers' Compensation and that the default in answering was caused by a misunderstanding as to whether his carrier would provide a defense on his behalf. The defendant thus satisfied the above standard and vacatur was warranted.
In addition, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint. A plaintiff injured during the course of his or her employment cannot maintain an action against the owner of the property where the accident occurred when the owner is also an officer of the corporation which employed the plaintiff ( see, Heritage v. Van Patten, 90 A.D.2d 936, affd 59 N.Y.2d 1017; McFarlane v. Chera, 211 A.D.2d 764).
Ritter, J.P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.