Opinion
Submitted September 28, 1908
Decided October 6, 1908
Miller, King, Lane Trafford for motion.
No one opposed.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hinckley v. Schwarszchild and Sulzberger Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1908
86 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1908)
Summaries of
Hinckley v. Schwarszchild and Sulzberger Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1908
86 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1908)
Case details for
Hinckley v. Schwarszchild and Sulzberger Company
Case Details
Full title:SYLVESTER B. HINCKLEY, Appellant, v . SCHWARSZCHILD AND SULZBERGER COMPANY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 6, 1908
Citations
86 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1908)
86 N.E. 1125
Citing Cases
Matter of Silberkraus
Such issuance of preferred shares does not infringe upon the vested rights of any outstanding shares. (…
Matter of KinneyThis was sustained as a valid exercise of the power reserved to the Legislature. ( Hinckley v. Schwarszchild…