From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 23, 2009
980 A.2d 910 (Conn. 2009)

Opinion

Decided September 23, 2009


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 28 (AC 29821), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment as to the nuisance claim based on its determination that General Statutes § 13a-149 was the plaintiff's exclusive remedy when it also determined that the plaintiff's claim did not fall within § 13a-149?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18455.

Juri E. Taalman, in support of the petition.

Beatrice S. Jordan, in opposition.


Summaries of

Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 23, 2009
980 A.2d 910 (Conn. 2009)
Case details for

Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor

Case Details

Full title:PAUL R. HIMMELSTEIN v. TOWN OF WINDSOR ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 23, 2009

Citations

980 A.2d 910 (Conn. 2009)
293 Conn. 927

Citing Cases

Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor

General Statutes § 13a–149 provides in relevant part: “Any person injured in person or property by means of a…

Himmelstein v. Town of Windsor

'' We granted the plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: ''Did the…