From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillsborough County v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 7, 1965
173 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1965)

Opinion

No. 34057.

April 7, 1965.

William C. McLean, Jr., Tampa, for petitioner.

William Terrell Hodges, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, for defendants.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon certified question under Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and on briefs of counsel for the respective parties and it appearing that the question certified does not meet the prerequisites of Rule 4.61, F.A.R. as interpreted in prior decisions of this Court, it is ordered that answer to the certified question be and the same is hereby declined. See: Dade County v. Philbrick, 162 So.2d 266, and special concurring opinion of Justice Hobson in State Road Department v. Forehand, 56 So.2d 901.

DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hillsborough County v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 7, 1965
173 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1965)
Case details for

Hillsborough County v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 7, 1965

Citations

173 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 1965)

Citing Cases

State v. Carroll

The above appellate rule provides certain limitations within which the question must be presented and these…

First Natl. Bk. T. v. Great Am. Ins. Co.

In re: Aron's Estate, Fla.App. 1960, 118 So.2d 546; Clar v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1960, 116 So.2d 34; Dade…