From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillman v. Eick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

CA 03-02087.

Decided June 14, 2004.

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered May 29, 2002. The amended order clarified the order, entered May 22, 2002, by providing that plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment was granted on negligence rather than on liability.

KENNEY, SHELTON, LIPTAK NOWAK, LLP, BUFFALO (WENDY A. SCOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MUSCATO, DI MILLO VONA, LLP, LOCKPORT (GEORGE V.C. MUSCATO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, KEHOE, MARTOCHE, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Hillman v. Eick ([appeal No. 1] 8 A.D.3d 898 [June 14, 2004]).


Summaries of

Hillman v. Eick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 14, 2004
8 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Hillman v. Eick

Case Details

Full title:MARK E. HILLMAN AND MELINDA HILLMAN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. DAVID L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 355