From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 23, 2000.

May 22, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 7, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d), without prejudice to renewal at a time when the plaintiff is able to provide a medical affidavit.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Steve S. Efron and Ren of counsel), for appellants.

Mark Koval, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal at a time when the plaintiff is able to provide a medical affidavit in opposition to such a motion. The plaintiff's incarceration at the time of the instant motion prevented him from being examined in order to provide a medical affidavit in opposition, and it appeared that the plaintiff was due to be released in a few months. As a result, the Supreme Court properly concluded the plaintiff could be examined upon his release, and, upon renewal of the motion, could submit the relevant material in opposition (see, CPLR 3212[f]; Urcan v. Cocarelli, 234 A.D.2d 537).

JOY, J.P., THOMPSON, GOLDSTEIN, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 22, 2000
272 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Hill v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HILL, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 22, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 521 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citing Cases

Apicella v. Vanwinkle

In other words, courts generally deny the summary judgment motion as premature when there was no reasonable…