Opinion
No. 94-P-1629.
May 13, 1996.
The judgment is reversed, and a new judgment is to enter remanding the case to the arbitrator for further proceedings in compliance with NEAMA rule 24.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hill v. Middlesex Insurance Company
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 13, 1996
664 N.E.2d 1207 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996)
Summaries of
Hill v. Middlesex Insurance Company
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 13, 1996
664 N.E.2d 1207 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996)
Case details for
Hill v. Middlesex Insurance Company
Case Details
Full title:LORRAINE R. HILL vs. MIDDLESEX INSURANCE COMPANY ANOTHER
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: May 13, 1996
Citations
664 N.E.2d 1207 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996)
40 Mass. App. Ct. 1121
Citing Cases
Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance Co. v. Swift
Immateriality of the increase of hazard contributing to or causing the loss: Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co., 35…