From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Metro. Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 12, 1988
848 F.2d 1522 (11th Cir. 1988)

Summary

holding that "[r]ecent Supreme Court decisions have directed that the appropriate statute of limitations for [1981 and 1983 actions] is the personal injury statute of the state in which the federal court is sitting"

Summary of this case from Everett v. Cobb County School District

Opinion

No. 85-8845.

July 12, 1988.

Isabel Gates Webster, Gary W. Walker, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Paul A. Howell, Jr., Kutak Rock Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion April 11, 1988, 11 Cir., 841 F.2d 1533)

Before KRAVITCH and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge.


Appellant Samuel Andrews has petitioned this court for rehearing of that part of our prior decision dealing with Mr. Andrews individually. See Hill v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, 841 F.2d 1533, 1544 (11th Cir. 1988). The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. Leaving all other portions of our opinion intact, we hereby delete those portions of our prior opinion discussing Mr. Andrews and insert the following in place of the fifteenth paragraph of Section III, 841 F.2d at 1543:

Because the district court did not make a finding as to why the following plaintiffs were denied relief with respect to their applications for bus driver, we remand the cases of David Johnson, Clifford Mitchell, and Alvin Shorts for an adjudication of their claims. We remand the cases of Harry Terrell and Samuel Andrews for a slightly different reason. Terrell applied June 1, 1979, and Andrews applied September 29, 1978. Their applications were rejected for no apparent reason. Although the district court found that Terrell became disabled in 1984 and suggested that Andrews became disabled in 1979, the court did not hold that there was any valid reason for the failure to consider these men initially. Accordingly, they may be entitled to damages for the failure to employ them before they became disabled.


Summaries of

Hill v. Metro. Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 12, 1988
848 F.2d 1522 (11th Cir. 1988)

holding that "[r]ecent Supreme Court decisions have directed that the appropriate statute of limitations for [1981 and 1983 actions] is the personal injury statute of the state in which the federal court is sitting"

Summary of this case from Everett v. Cobb County School District
Case details for

Hill v. Metro. Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HILL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 12, 1988

Citations

848 F.2d 1522 (11th Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

Welch v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Actions or remarks of an employer which reflect a discriminatory attitude would be direct evidence of…

Weaver v. Casa Gallardo, Inc.

411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).See Caban-Wheeler, 904 F.2d at 1555; Hill v. Metropolitan…