From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Maples

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12CV00145 BSM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 12, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12CV00145 BSM/JTK

12-12-2012

RONALD L. HILL REG #15295-045 PLAINTIFF v. K. MAPLES, Physician's Assistant, Federal Correctional Institution, Forrest City, Arkansas et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney [Doc. No. 14] have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

Plaintiff Ronald Hill's claims against defendants Jason A. Sickler, K. Cook, A. Crow, K. Peters, G. Toliver, R. Taylor, and H. Matos are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Maples

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12CV00145 BSM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Maples

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. HILL REG #15295-045 PLAINTIFF v. K. MAPLES, Physician's…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12CV00145 BSM/JTK (E.D. Ark. Dec. 12, 2012)