From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ORANGEBURG DIVISION
Nov 25, 2019
Civil Action No. 5:18-01918-MGL-KDW (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:18-01918-MGL-KDW

11-25-2019

TEDRIC DELVION HILL, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT JAMES S. JOHNSON, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Tedric Delvion Hill (Hill), proceeding pro se, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights. This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting Defendant Lieutenant James S. Johnson's (Johnson) motion for summary judgment be denied. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on October 25, 2019. To date, Johnson has not filed any objections to the report. "[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court Johnson's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 25th day of November 2019 in Columbia, South Carolina.

s/ Mary Geiger Lewis

MARY GEIGER LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

*****

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Hill v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ORANGEBURG DIVISION
Nov 25, 2019
Civil Action No. 5:18-01918-MGL-KDW (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Hill v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:TEDRIC DELVION HILL, Plaintiff, v. LIEUTENANT JAMES S. JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ORANGEBURG DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:18-01918-MGL-KDW (D.S.C. Nov. 25, 2019)

Citing Cases

Ellerbe v. Thomas

Plaintiff cites to a case from this court in support of his position that excessive force was deployed, but…