Opinion
3:01-CV-0096-G.
May 2, 2001.
ORDER
After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the findings and conclusions the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hill v. Johnson
United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 2, 2001
3:01-CV-0096-G (N.D. Tex. May. 2, 2001)
Summaries of
Hill v. Johnson
United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 2, 2001
3:01-CV-0096-G (N.D. Tex. May. 2, 2001)
Case details for
Hill v. Johnson
Case Details
Full title:COREY THEOPLUS HILL, #755642, Petitioner, v. GARY L. JOHNSON, Director…
Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Date published: May 2, 2001
Citations
3:01-CV-0096-G (N.D. Tex. May. 2, 2001)