From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 1, 2013
NO. 5:13CV00014 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 5:13CV00014 JLH-HDY

04-01-2013

JESSIE HILL PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The Court has received proposed Findings and Recommendations from Magistrate Judge H. David Young. After careful review of those Findings and Recommendations, the timely objections received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2554 Cases in the United States District Court, the Court must determine whether to issue a certificate of appealability in the final order. In § 2254 cases, a certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). The Court finds no issue on which petitioner has made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2013.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Apr 1, 2013
NO. 5:13CV00014 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Hill v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE HILL PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Apr 1, 2013

Citations

NO. 5:13CV00014 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Apr. 1, 2013)