From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 4, 2012
CASE NO. 5:12CV00125 BSM/JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12CV00125 BSM/JJV

12-04-2012

KENTRELL HILL ADC #95734 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No. 16] and the filed objections [Doc. No. 17] have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Respondent Ray Hobbs's motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 14] is granted.

2. Petitioner Kentrell Hill's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice.

An appropriate judgment shall accompany this order.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hill v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 4, 2012
CASE NO. 5:12CV00125 BSM/JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Hill v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:KENTRELL HILL ADC #95734 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Dec 4, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12CV00125 BSM/JJV (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2012)