From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Highland Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 7, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied defendant Root's motion for summary judgment in this medical malpractice action to recover for second and third degree burns plaintiff's decedent suffered during surgery to remove blockage in an artery in his leg. Plaintiff established that defendant Root, an anesthesiologist, was present throughout the surgery. Plaintiff's expert opined that the burns appeared to be similar to classical thermal burns caused by contact with hot materials or objects. This evidence is sufficient to establish a prima facie case of defendant Root's negligence on the basis of a permissible inference under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (see, Mack v. Hall Hosp., 121 A.D.2d 431, 432-433; Fogal v Genesee Hosp., 41 A.D.2d 468, 474-477; Gorka v. Highland Hosp., 132 Misc.2d 783, 787-788; cf., Pipers v. Rosenow, 39 A.D.2d 240, 242-245).


Summaries of

Hill v. Highland Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Hill v. Highland Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JOY HILL, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of HOWARD HILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

States v. Lourdes Hospital

Plaintiffs rely on cases from other Departments which hold that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is…

Rose v. Antell

ce a plaintiff satisfies the burden of proof on these three elements, the res ipsa loquitur doctrine permits…