From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. City of El Dorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION
Jun 3, 2016
Case No. 13-cv-1089 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 3, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-1089

06-03-2016

ELEASE HILL; CARLTON NEWSOME; VADA SMITH PLAINTIFFS v. CITY OF EL DORADO, an incorporated body through Mayor Frank Hash in his Official Capacity as may and the City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. (ECF Nos. 68 & 119). Plaintiffs have responded to these motions. (ECF Nos. 83 & 126). Defendants have filed Replies. (ECF Nos. 86 & 127). For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of September 29, 2015, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 68) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of May 17, 2016, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 119) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of June, 2016.

/s/ Susan O. Hickey

Susan O. Hickey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hill v. City of El Dorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION
Jun 3, 2016
Case No. 13-cv-1089 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Hill v. City of El Dorado

Case Details

Full title:ELEASE HILL; CARLTON NEWSOME; VADA SMITH PLAINTIFFS v. CITY OF EL DORADO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION

Date published: Jun 3, 2016

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-1089 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 3, 2016)