From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill Top Toys, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1957
4 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

June 17, 1957


In an action by a lessee of store premises against the owner of the building and the lessee of other store premises therein, to enjoin the sale of toys and like goods by said other lessee, the Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company, the appeal is from an order granting a motion for an injunction pendente lite and denying cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order reversed, without costs, motion for an injunction pendente lite denied, and cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted. Respondent's lease provides that the sale of toys by another tenant in the building, incidental to the business of such other tenant, shall not be deemed a breach of the restrictive covenant in respondent's lease. The lease of the appellant tenant, which provides that said appellant may carry on a general merchandising business, contains no restrictive covenant. Since that lease antedates respondent's lease by almost a year, the appellant tenant, when it made its lease, could have had no notice of the restrictive covenant which respondent seeks to enforce. In the absence of such notice, respondent may not be afforded relief ( Senn v. Ladd, 179 Misc. 306, and cases cited). Wenzel, Acting P.J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hill Top Toys, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1957
4 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Hill Top Toys, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:HILL TOP TOYS, INC., Respondent, v. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1957

Citations

4 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Farmers Mech. Savings v. First Federal S. L

Independent of any rights which might be conferred by statute, it appears to be the majority view that a…

Deepdale Cleaners v. Friedman

The plaintiff, therefore, is not entitled to injunctive relief. ( Hill Top Toys v. Great Atlantic Pacific…