From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Nov 18, 1941
4 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1941)

Opinion

Opinion Filed November 18, 1941

A Writ of Error from the Circuit Court for Polk County, D.O. Rogers, Judge.

Carver Langston, for Plaintiffs in Error;

Don Register for Defendant in Error, Mrs. E.T. Wilson, and McKay, Macfarlane, Jackson Ferguson, for Defendant in Error, W.F. Jolley.


On motion of defendants in this case, at the close of plaintiffs' evidence, a verdict in favor of the defendants was instructed by the trial court, a verdict was returned according to such instruction, and a judgment rendered thereon in favor of the defendants, to which plaintiffs' sued out this writ of error.

It is well settled that a party moving for a directed verdict admits, not only the facts shown by the evidence, but also every reasonable inference favorable to the adverse party that the jury might fairly and reasonably arrive at from the evidence. And if there is evidence which is conflicting, or evidence which tends to prove the issue, the case should be submitted to the jury as a question of fact to be determined by them, under proper instructions by the Court.

Upon careful consideration of the evidence in this case, a majority of the court are of the opinion that the court below erred in instructing a verdict in favor of the defendants.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and CHAPMAN, J. J., concur.

TERRELL, THOMAS and ADAMS, J. J., dissent.


Summaries of

Hill v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Nov 18, 1941
4 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1941)
Case details for

Hill v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:J. D. HILL and ALMA MARIE HILL, joined by her husband J. D. HILL, v. MRS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Nov 18, 1941

Citations

4 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1941)
4 So. 2d 712

Citing Cases

McAllister v. Miami Daily News

It is established law that a party moving for a directed verdict admits not only facts shown by the evidence…

Katz v. Bear

Power to direct a verdict should be cautiously exercised and the same should never be granted unless the…