From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightower v. Florida Parole Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 17, 1998
706 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 96-1561.

Opinion filed February 17, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, William Gary, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Bradley R. Bischoff, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Alonzo Hightower appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of mandamus and complaint for injunction and stay of administrative action. We treat the appeals as petitions for writ of certiorari. See Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D130 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 31, 1997). Finding no abuse of due process and no departure from the essential requirements of law, we deny relief.

Appellant makes several arguments claiming his entitlement to reinstatement on control release or the reduction of his sentence because of improperly forfeited gain-time and out-time. We find all of his claims to be without merit. See Dowdy v. Singletary, 1998 WL 3332 (Fla. Jan. 8, 1998); Gay v. Singletary, 700 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 1997); Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1997); Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1985). We address only his claim that he is entitled to credit for time served in New Jersey custody during his control release.

Hightower was convicted for two counts of burglary of a dwelling in October 1991 and began serving a twelve-year sentence. In July 1992, he was placed on control release and sent to New Jersey to answer to outstanding charges in that state. He returned to Florida about 270 days later to continue his control release. In 1994, he violated the terms and conditions of his control release, and it was revoked. Along with the forfeited gain-time and the time he spent in Florida on control release, he also lost the time spent in New Jersey custody.

While it is true that during the time he was incarcerated in New Jersey he was not in an environment less restrictive than a Florida prison, he did get the opportunity to finish his outstanding New Jersey obligations. Had appellee not placed him on control release, he would still owe time in New Jersey. This time in New Jersey custody was not related to his Florida crimes and sentences, and the denial of credit for this time by the appellee when appellant's control release was revoked was well within its authority. See Dowdy;Gay; Bowles, supra.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

BARFIELD, C.J., JOANOS, J. and SMITH, Senior Judge, CONCUR.


Summaries of

Hightower v. Florida Parole Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 17, 1998
706 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Hightower v. Florida Parole Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO HIGHTOWER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 17, 1998

Citations

706 So. 2d 70 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Hodges v. State

We find appellant's claim to be without factual support or legal merit. See, e.g., Kronz v. State, 462 So.2d…