From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightour v. Murray

Superior Court of North Carolina HALIFAX —
Apr 1, 1793
2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)

Opinion

April Term, 1793

Sureties in an attachment are simply bail, and may surrender their principal.

HIGHTOUR had sued one Bowers, who had removed to avoid his creditors, by original attachment; and Murray had replevied the property attached. Hightour obtained judgment in the County Court of FRANKLIN, and Murray surrendered Bowers as his bail in discharge of himself. Hightour then took his sci. fa. against Murray, to subject him to the debt, alleging he had no power to surrender, having become bound for Bower's performance of the judgment of the court. The county court gave judgment for Murray. Upon which Hightour appealed.

Davie on the part of Murray.

Haywood for Hightour.


An original attachment is only intended to compel appearance, and where sureties are given, they are exactly to all purposes as bail, and may surrender.

Judgment for defendant.

See Act of 1777, Rev., ch. 115, sec. 30.

Cited: Summers v. Parker, 4 N.C. 581, 583; Deaver v. Keith, 27 N.C. 376.


Summaries of

Hightour v. Murray

Superior Court of North Carolina HALIFAX —
Apr 1, 1793
2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)
Case details for

Hightour v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:HIGHTOUR v. MURRAY

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina HALIFAX —

Date published: Apr 1, 1793

Citations

2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)

Citing Cases

Summers v. Parker

" It appears to me that the same and only the same remedy is to be had in this case as in any other case…