From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hidalgo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District
Apr 9, 2024
No. 01-24-00209-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2024)

Opinion

01-24-00209-CR

04-09-2024

MICHAEL HIDALGO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Do not publish. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 0549326A

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Hightower.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Michael Hidalgo appeals from the trial court's denial of his original writ of error coram nobis. We dismiss the appeal.

"A petition for writ of coram nobis is a writ of error directed to a court requesting it to review its own judgment based on alleged errors of fact." Padilla v. State, No. 13-21-00093-CR, 2021 WL 2371515, at *1 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi-Edinburgh June 10, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing to In re Reyes, 195 S.W.3d 127, 127 (Tex. App.-Waco 2005, orig. proceeding)). The Court of Criminal Appeals has long held that the common law writ of coram nobis is inapplicable in Texas. See Ex parte Massey, 249 S.W.2d 599, 601 (Tex. Crim. App. 1952); see also In re Parker, No. 03-17-00183-CV, 2017 WL 1228891, at *1 (Tex. App.-Austin Mar. 31, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Clark v. State, No. 10-05-00301-CR, 2005 WL 2100270, at *1 (Tex. App.-Waco Aug. 31, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal from denial of writ of coram nobis). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Hidalgo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District
Apr 9, 2024
No. 01-24-00209-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Hidalgo v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HIDALGO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District

Date published: Apr 9, 2024

Citations

No. 01-24-00209-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 9, 2024)

Citing Cases

Hidalgo v. Texas

On April 9, 2024, the 1st District Court of Appeals denied his appeal because “[t]he Court of Criminal…