From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 15, 1978
362 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. JJ-414.

September 15, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, M.C. Blanchard, J.

Cicero Hicks, in pro per.

No appearance for appellee.


An appeal from a denial of appellant's motion to vacate a portion of a sentence under F.R.Cr.P. 3.850. Appellant urges that the trial court erred in giving him a "split sentence" — three years imprisonment followed by seven years probation — on his nolo contendere plea to a charge of attempted second degree murder. While this argument may have previously had merit under Robinson v. State, 256 So.2d 390 (Fla.3d DCA 1973) and its progeny, it is now clear that a trial court may in its discretion sentence a defendant to a period of incarceration followed by a period of probation. See Section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1977); State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976), and State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1978).

SMITH, Acting C.J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 15, 1978
362 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Hicks v. State

Case Details

Full title:CICERO HICKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 15, 1978

Citations

362 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Citing Cases

Wilcher v. State

The state contends, and we agree, that section 948.01(4), Florida Statutes (1979), specifically authorizes…

Terrell v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Hicks v. State, 362 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). ANSTEAD, MOORE…