From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 5, 1994
640 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2658.

August 5, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County; John W. Watson, III, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and M.A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robin Compton Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm Eric A. Hicks' convictions for possession of cocaine and carrying a concealed weapon; however, we must vacate Hicks' sentences on the authority of State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 1994), which was decided subsequent to the imposition of sentence in this case. Because the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand, the court can impose a departure sentence as long as proper contemporaneous written reasons are provided. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1989).

Convictions AFFIRMED; sentences VACATED and cause REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 5, 1994
640 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Hicks v. State

Case Details

Full title:ERIC A. HICKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 5, 1994

Citations

640 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. State

We vacate Edward Richardson's sentence for possession of cocaine and remand for resentencing on the authority…

Pulles v. State

"[B]ecause the trial court did not realize that it was imposing a departure sentence, on remand the court may…