From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Hicks

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 917 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided October 27th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 92.

Mr. Emanuel Weits, Mr. James R. Bowen and Mr. John S. Applegate Son, for the appellants.

Mr. Leo J. Warwick, for the respondent.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Hicks

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 27, 1926
134 A. 917 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Hicks v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:ELLA HICKS, complainant, v. LEON HICKS et al., defendants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 1926

Citations

134 A. 917 (N.J. 1926)
134 A. 917

Citing Cases

Camden Trust Co. v. Leopold

The conditional words were annexed to the payment and not to the gift of the legacy. Hicks v. Hicks, 99 N.J.…