From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Hicks

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 24, 2007
962 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D06-3446.

July 27, 2007. Rehearing Denied August 24, 2007.

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Harry Stein, Senior Judge.

William H. Drumm, of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen Ginsburg, P.A. Sarasota, for Appellant.

Scott Gediman, of Gediman, Duffy Gediman P.C., Everett, MA, for Appellee.


The trial court's order enforcing the parties' prenuptial and marital settlement agreements was supported by competent, substantial evidence. An appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence. Okoh v. Okoh, 918 So.2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, LAWSON, EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Hicks

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 24, 2007
962 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Hicks v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:Lori HICKS, Appellant, v. Charles HICKS, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 24, 2007

Citations

962 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

R.M. v. Dept. of Child

Although R.M. asks us to reweigh the evidence, we cannot do so. See, e.g., Hicks v. Hicks, 962 So.2d…