From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Cocks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

January, 1916.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that as to each defendant the examination directed would necessarily be to establish the facts which would tend to prove defendant guilty of a crime. (See People's Coat, Apron Towel Supply v. Light, 168 App. Div. 142.) Jenks, P.J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Cocks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1916
172 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Hicks v. Cocks

Case Details

Full title:John J. Hicks, Respondent, v. James H. Cocks and John S. Burke, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1916

Citations

172 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)