From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 9, 1991
946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir. 1991)

Opinion

Nos. 88-2769, 88-2817.

October 9, 1991.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before McMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

On March 18, 1991, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of this court in the present case and remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of this court's en banc opinion to be filed in Taggart v. Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit, 915 F.2d 396 (8th Cir.) ( Taggart), reh'g en banc granted, 934 F.2d 1414 (1990). Brown Group, Inc. v. Hicks, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1299, 113 L.Ed.2d 234 (1991).

On June 6, 1991, this court filed its en banc opinion in Taggart holding that, after the Supreme Court's decision in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989), discriminatory discharge claims are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. 935 F.2d 947, 948 (8th Cir. 1991). The mandate in Taggart was issued in August 1991.

Pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court, we have reconsidered our opinion in light of this court's en banc opinion in Taggart. Accordingly, we now reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 9, 1991
946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir. 1991)
Case details for

Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH G. HICKS, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. BROWN GROUP, INC., D/B/A…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 9, 1991

Citations

946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc.

Following remand, the panel unanimously reversed the judgment of the district court, concluding that Hicks's…