From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickman v. Sacino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 12, 1990
566 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-1262.

September 12, 1990. Rehearing Denied October 12, 1990.

Appeal of non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Patricia W. Cocalis, Judge.

Ronald E. Solomon of Solomon Murphy, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

John Beranek of Aurell, Radey, Hinkle Thomas, Tallahassee, and Krupnick, Campbell, Malone Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Mary Jo Meives of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick Schneider, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee Tony Dean Evans.


Charles A. Hickman and Amira Services, Inc. appeal from two non-final orders denying their motions to dismiss for improper venue or in the alternative, motions to transfer. We affirm. Absent "palpable" abuse or a grossly "improvident" exercise of discretion, a trial court's granting or refusal of a motion for change in venue based on forum non conveniens will not be disturbed. See D.L. Thornton, M.D. v. DeBerry, 548 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We further find that appellants failed to timely assert the ground of joint residency venue privilege. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140(b) and (h).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hickman v. Sacino

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 12, 1990
566 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Hickman v. Sacino

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ANDREW HICKMAN AND SAM AND BEA AMIRA SERVICES, INC., APPELLANTS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 12, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 903 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

STADLER v. FORD WERKE AG

This constitutes an inappropriate use of discretion. See Hickman v. Sacino, 566 So.2d 903 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Instrumentation Ser. v. Data Mgmt

However, some of the persons identified as potential witnesses are residents of Broward or Palm Beach…