From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickey v. Murry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Mar 16, 2021
No. 3:21-CV-087-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:21-CV-087-TAV-HBG

03-16-2021

ANTHONY HICKEY, Plaintiff, v. LT. MURRY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the Tennessee Department of Correction incarcerated in the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center ("TTCC"), has filed a pro se complaint alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [Doc. 1] and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 4].

Plaintiff's only claim for relief arises out of an incident on February 6, 2021, in which he alleges that Defendant Lt. Murry used excessive force against him [Doc. 1 p. 4]. However, Plaintiff's trust account statement establishes that he was incarcerated in TTCC on February 6, 2021 [Doc. 4 p. 4]. The general venue statute for federal district courts provides in relevant part as follows:

A civil action may be brought in—

(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located;

(2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or
(3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.
28 U.S.C.A. § 1391(b)(1)-(3).

As set forth above, Plaintiff's complaint sets forth a claim that arose during his incarceration in the TTCC, which is in Trousdale County, Tennessee, which lies within the Nashville Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. 28 U.S.C. § 123(b)(2); https://www.tnmd.uscourts.gov/divisions-court. The Court therefore concludes that the proper venue for this case is the Nashville Division of the Middle District of Tennessee. See O'Neill v. Battisti, 472 F.2d 789, 791 (6th Cir. 1972) (finding that venue in a suit against a public official lies in the district where he performs his official duties). A federal district court may transfer a civil action to any district or division where it could have been filed originally "in the interest of justice." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

Accordingly, the Clerk will be DIRECTED to transfer this action to the Nashville Division of the Middle District of Tennessee and to close this Court's file.

AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT ORDER WILL ENTER.

s/ Thomas A. Varlan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hickey v. Murry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Mar 16, 2021
No. 3:21-CV-087-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hickey v. Murry

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HICKEY, Plaintiff, v. LT. MURRY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Date published: Mar 16, 2021

Citations

No. 3:21-CV-087-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2021)