From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LD Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 13-00494-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 13-00494-EJD

03-13-2013

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LD PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS KRISTOFOR T. HENNING CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS KRISTOFOR T. HENNING Attorneys for Plaintiff HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP KARL S. KRONENBERGER KARL S. KRONENBERGER Attorney for Defendant LD PRODUCTS, INC.


MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS (SBN)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.442.1000
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
E-mail: cbanks@morganlewis.com
KRISTOFOR T. HENNING
khenning@morganlewis.com
Pro hac vice application forthcoming
SHEVON L. SCARAFILE
sscarafile@morganlewis.com
Pro hac vice application forthcoming
1701 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2921
Tel: 215.963.5000
Fax: 215.963.5001
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING

TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S

COUNTERCLAIM

Through this Stipulated Request and [Proposed] Order, Plaintiff, Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") and Defendant LD Products, Inc. ("LD") stipulate and agree to the following as set forth below, and jointly seek that the Court approve this extension pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2.

WHEREAS, on February 4, 2013, HP filed a Complaint against LD.

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2013, LD filed an Answer to HP's Complaint and a counterclaim against HP.

WHEREAS, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline for HP to respond to LD's counterclaim is March 19, 2013.

WHEREAS, HP requested and LD agreed to an extension for HP to respond to LD's counterclaim until and including March 22, 2013.

WHEREAS, there have not been any previous time modifications in this case and the extension the parties agreed to does not affect any other deadlines in this matter.

ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate to, and request the Court's approval of a deadline of March 22, 2013 for HP to respond to LD's counterclaim.

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS

KRISTOFOR T. HENNING

By:_____________________

CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS

KRISTOFOR T. HENNING

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

KARL S. KRONENBERGER

By _____________________

KARL S. KRONENBERGER

Attorney for Defendant

LD PRODUCTS, INC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

_____________________

The Honorable Edward J. Davila

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LD Prods., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Mar 13, 2013
Case No. 13-00494-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LD Prods., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. LD PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 13-00494-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)