From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewan v. Callozzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 1996
223 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 18, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).


Plaintiffs' claims that they were unable to resume daily activities for 90 out of the 180 days following the accident are simply not supported by any proof of confinement, incapacity, or other substantial curtailment of daily activities sufficient to make out a prima facie showing of serious injury ( see, Licari v Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 236, 238-239). Nor do plaintiffs' affidavits or that of their doctor, based on subjective complaints of pain, demonstrate any permanent injuries ( see, Velez v Cohan, 203 A.D.2d 156).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Hewan v. Callozzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 1996
223 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Hewan v. Callozzo

Case Details

Full title:AINSLEY HEWAN, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, HYACINTH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
636 N.Y.S.2d 336

Citing Cases

Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Systems, Inc.

This paragraph likewise fails to establish serious injury. The allegations concerning such alleged…

Thompson v. Bronx Merch. Funding Servs., LLC

It is alleged in her Verified Bill of Particulars that plaintiff was confined to bed and home for one (1)…