From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heuer Industrials, Inc. v. Crum

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 4, 1992
415 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

A92A0846.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1992.

Action on contract. Randolph Superior Court. Before Judge Bishop.

Donaldson Bell, George P. Donaldson III, for appellant. Bowles Bowles, Jesse G. Bowles III, for appellee.


Crum sued Heuer Industrials, Inc., in a dispute over the terms of a real estate sales contract, and obtained a judgment for damages in the amount of $3,289.70, from which Heuer Industrials filed this direct appeal on January 28, 1992.

Prior to July 1, 1991, a direct appeal could be brought in actions for damages in which the judgment exceeded $2,500. See former OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). For appeals filed on or after July 1, 1991, OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6) was amended to reflect that "[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $10,000.00 or less" must be taken by the application procedures set forth within the Code section. Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the discretionary application procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35. Covrig v. Campbell, 187 Ga. App. 39, 40 ( 369 S.E.2d 293) (1988).

Appeal dismissed. Birdsong, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1992.


Summaries of

Heuer Industrials, Inc. v. Crum

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 4, 1992
415 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Heuer Industrials, Inc. v. Crum

Case Details

Full title:HEUER INDUSTRIALS, INC. v. CRUM

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 4, 1992

Citations

415 S.E.2d 307 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
415 S.E.2d 307

Citing Cases

Robinwood, Inc. v. Baker

The court on its own motion directed a verdict for defendant Baker as to Robinwood's damage claim and in…

Orgertrice v. Nash

Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-35. See generally CaShar,…