From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hessel v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 19, 2007
155 P.3d 877 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

In Hessel v. Hill, Mo.App., 38 S.W.2d 490, 491, 492, it appeared that the defendant sold to the plaintiff his undertaking business at Liberty, Missouri, under a contract whereby he agreed "not re-enter the undertaking business in Liberty, Mo., or within a radius of ten miles, of said city, for a period of ten years'".

Summary of this case from Brown v. Childers

Opinion

No. A126965.

Submitted on record and briefs January 5, 2007.

June 19, 2007.

Brian Douglas Hessel filed the briefs pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Richard D. Wasserman, Attorney-in-Charge, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Petition for judicial review dismissed. ORS 421.194; see also Shelby v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 102, 915 P2d 414, rev den, 324 Or 18 (1996).


Summaries of

Hessel v. Hill

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 19, 2007
155 P.3d 877 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)

In Hessel v. Hill, Mo.App., 38 S.W.2d 490, 491, 492, it appeared that the defendant sold to the plaintiff his undertaking business at Liberty, Missouri, under a contract whereby he agreed "not re-enter the undertaking business in Liberty, Mo., or within a radius of ten miles, of said city, for a period of ten years'".

Summary of this case from Brown v. Childers
Case details for

Hessel v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN DOUGLAS HESSEL, Petitioner, v. Jean HILL, Superintendent, Snake…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 19, 2007

Citations

155 P.3d 877 (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
155 P.3d 877

Citing Cases

Weaver v. Jordan

In Montgomery v. Getty, Mo.App., 284 S.W.2d 313, this court held that contracts in restraint of trade are…

Ryska v. Anderson

Further, where the purpose of a covenant is to provide against competition, the parties should comply not…