From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. v. NCC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 16, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


The action was properly dismissed on the ground that under Delaware law, majority shareholders have no nonderivative fiduciary duty to share proportionately with minority shareholders the "control premium" received from the sale of a majority share in the corporation ( see, Thorpe v. CERBCO, Inc., 676 A.2d 436, 441). Nothing in the complaint can be fairly construed as alleging that the corporation was harmed by the sale, only that plaintiffs were harmed in being deprived of a proportionate share of the price premium defendants received for control of. the corporation (compare, supra).

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. v. NCC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 16, 1998
251 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc. v. NCC Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERZOG, HEINE, GEDULD, INC., et al., Appellants, v. NCC INDUSTRIES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 173 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

MATTER OF TOPPS CO., INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIG.

Indeed this court is frequently called upon to apply the laws of Delaware. See, e.g., Venturetek, L.P. v Rand…