From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hertz Rental Company v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34502.

March 9, 1966.

Writ of certiorari to District Court of Appeal, First District.

J. Donelson Jones of Jones Jones, Panama City, for petitioner.

J. Ben Watkins, of Truett Watkins, Tallahassee, Davenport, Johnston, Harris Urquhart and Earl R. Duncan, Panama City, for respondents.


We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, First District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.

After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, First District, (Hertz Rental Co. v. Pitts [Fla.App. 1st] 174 So.2d 437) in explanation and support of its decision, we have concluded that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, CALDWELL, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hertz Rental Company v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Hertz Rental Company v. Pitts

Case Details

Full title:HERTZ RENTAL COMPANY (HERTZ-RENT-A-CAR), PETITIONER, v. DOROTHY PITTS, AND…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 9, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1966)