From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hershon v. Abelson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1934
69 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1934)

Opinion

No. 114.

January 8, 1934.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Action by Jacob Hershon, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Sterling Bedding Shops, Incorporated, bankrupt, against Anne Abelson, to recover a preference under the Bankruptcy Act. From a judgment entered on a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Harry Tabershaw, of New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Finkelstein Jacobs, of New York City (Marcy Finkelstein, of New York City, of counsel), for Jacob Hershon, trustee in bankruptcy.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


The plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of the Sterling Bedding Shops, Inc. The business of the bankrupt was largely conducted by Oscar Abelson, its vice president. The defendant is his mother. The bankrupt borrowed $3,000 of the defendant and gave her its notes which she indorsed and discounted with a relative named Ponemone. After the bankrupt became insolvent and within four months of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, it transferred enough of its accounts receivable to Ponemone to pay the notes except a balance of $149.00 which was paid him by check. The books of the bankrupt showed the loan from the defendant and the transfer of the accounts receivable to her to cancel it, but the testimony that the payment was made directly to Ponemone instead of to the defendant was otherwise uncontradicted. Likewise the evidence was uncontradicted that the defendant did not know that the notes were paid or anything about the financial troubles of the bankrupt. Whenever she asked her son anything about the business he told her everything was all right.

The evidence was probably sufficient to warrant the jury in reaching the conclusion that the bankrupt was insolvent when the notes were paid but, in order to recover the payment from the defendant as the person to be benefited by the preference, it was necessary to show also that she had reason to believe that the payment would effect a preference. Bankruptcy Act, § 60b (11 USCA § 96(b); W.S. Peck Co. v. Whitmer (C.C.A.) 231 F. 893; Grant v. First National Bank, 97 U.S. 80, 24 L. Ed. 971; In re Salmon (C.C.A.) 249 F. 300.

There was no evidence of this essential fact.

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Hershon v. Abelson

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 8, 1934
69 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1934)
Case details for

Hershon v. Abelson

Case Details

Full title:HERSHON v. ABELSON

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 8, 1934

Citations

69 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1934)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Woolf

When this has been done, consideration must be given to the rule, for which there is ample authority, that if…