From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hershko v. Troutman Sanders, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 13, 2021
193 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13559N Index No. 451878/16 Case No. 2020-00118

04-13-2021

Isaac HERSHKO et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, et al., Defendants, The Berkman Office, LLC, et al., Nonparty-Appellants.

Skarzynski Marick & Black LLP, New York ( Evan Shapiro of counsel), for appellants.


Skarzynski Marick & Black LLP, New York ( Evan Shapiro of counsel), for appellants.

Kapnick, J.P., Kern, Singh, Scarpulla, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Kalish, J.), entered December 4, 2019, which denied nonparty appellants' motion for sanctions against plaintiffs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellants ceased to be parties to this action on June 25, 2018, when judgment was entered dismissing the complaint as against them. Thus, when they moved for sanctions on September 11, 2019, the court was not authorized to award sanctions to them ( 22 NYCRR 130–1.1 [a]["The court, in its discretion, may award (costs) to any party or attorney in any civil action or proceeding before the court"]). Were we to address the merits, we would find that sanctions are not warranted.


Summaries of

Hershko v. Troutman Sanders, LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 13, 2021
193 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Hershko v. Troutman Sanders, LLP

Case Details

Full title:Isaac Hershko et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Troutman Sanders, LLP, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 13, 2021

Citations

193 A.D.3d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
193 A.D.3d 503
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 2245