From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herron v. Winn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 25, 2015
No. CV-13-00358-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Sep. 25, 2015)

Opinion

No. CV-13-00358-TUC-JGZ

09-25-2015

Brian Keith Herron, Petitioner, v. Louis W. Winn, Respondent.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich that recommends denying Petitioner's Amended § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpuson its merits. (Doc. 35.)

A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Markovich's recommendation is not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp, 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

"The plain language of [28 U.S.C.] § 2253(c)(1) does not require a petitioner to obtain a [certificate of appealability] in order to appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition." Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 2008). "Nor is there any other statutory basis for imposing a [certificate of appealability] requirement on legitimate § 2241 petitions. Although state prisoners proceeding under § 2241 must obtain a [certificate of appealability], see § 2253(c)(1)(A), there is no parallel requirement for federal prisoners." Id. Thus, because Petitioner is a federal prisoner bringing a legitimate § 2241 petition, a certificate of appealability is not required.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) is accepted and adopted;

2. Petitioner's Amended § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 6) is DENIED;

3. Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Injunction (Doc. 31) and Request for Status Conference (Doc. 32) are DENIED AS MOOT;

4. J.T. Shartle, Warden, shall be substituted as Respondent, in place of Louis W. Winn, Jr., pursuant to Rule 25, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Rule 43(c)(2) of the Fed. R. App. P.;

5. This case is dismissed with prejudice;

6. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Dated this 25th day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Herron v. Winn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 25, 2015
No. CV-13-00358-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Sep. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Herron v. Winn

Case Details

Full title:Brian Keith Herron, Petitioner, v. Louis W. Winn, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Sep 25, 2015

Citations

No. CV-13-00358-TUC-JGZ (D. Ariz. Sep. 25, 2015)

Citing Cases

Valle v. United States

(petitioner sufficiently exhausted remedies because he mailed his appeal form to the Central Office,…

McRae v. Winn

Because Petitioner is a federal prisoner whose petition can legitimately be brought under § 2241, he is not…