From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 12, 2002
823 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

stating that the trial court erred in setting the amount of restitution based on hearsay evidence to which the defendant properly objected

Summary of this case from Toole v. State

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-0811

Opinion filed August 12, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Michael R. Weatherby, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Kenneth D. Pratt, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Because the trial court erred in setting the amount of restitution in favor of Ryder Trucks based on hearsay evidence to which the defendant properly objected, we reverse the restitution order in favor of Ryder and remand for another restitution hearing. Boyle v. State, 589 So.2d 1015 (Fla.2d DCA 1991).

BOOTH, WOLF and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Herrington v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 12, 2002
823 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

stating that the trial court erred in setting the amount of restitution based on hearsay evidence to which the defendant properly objected

Summary of this case from Toole v. State
Case details for

Herrington v. State

Case Details

Full title:NICKY HERRINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 12, 2002

Citations

823 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

V. B. v. State

Appellant correctly asserts, and the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in ordering restitution…

Toole v. State

Dist. Ct. App. 2006) ("We reverse and remand for a new restitution hearing because the State's evidence was…