From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HERNSTAT v. SAB HOLDING CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Summary

In Hernstat v. Sab Holding Corp. (243 App. Div. 808) the Appellate Division in this department reversed an order which granted a similar motion, characterizing such granting as "improvident."

Summary of this case from Coraci v. Yurkin

Opinion

March, 1935.


Order granting defendant's motion to amend its answer, in an action based on negligence, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The granting of the motion was improvident. Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

HERNSTAT v. SAB HOLDING CORPORATION

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

In Hernstat v. Sab Holding Corp. (243 App. Div. 808) the Appellate Division in this department reversed an order which granted a similar motion, characterizing such granting as "improvident."

Summary of this case from Coraci v. Yurkin
Case details for

HERNSTAT v. SAB HOLDING CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:IDA HERNSTAT and Another, Appellants, v. SAB HOLDING CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 808 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Nathan v. Long Island Lighting Company

It was an improvident exercise of discretion, resulting in prejudice to appellants, to permit the amendment,…

Coraci v. Yurkin

Nowhere in the moving papers is there any statement on the part of the person who verified the original…