From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herndon v. Herndon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 13, 1991
575 So. 2d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-0811.

March 13, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Scott M. Kenney, J.

Osborne Walker O'Quinn, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Leif J. Grazi of Law Offices of Grazi, Gianino Cohen, Stuart, for appellee.


The appellant, Alan Herndon, appeals the trial court's order vacating previous orders awarding paternal grandparent visitation. The trial court set aside the orders under the mistaken belief that this was mandated by Shuler v. Shuler, 371 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

We reverse because the trial court did have jurisdiction to enter the visitation orders. See Putnal v. Putnal, 392 So.2d 613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). At the time of the orders, the pending action was between true contestants, the former husband and former wife. Putnal recognizes that grandparents may move for visitation under section 61.13, Florida Statutes, in a pending action, either during the dissolution proceeding or during post-dissolution proceedings.

Additionally, we note that Shuler v. Shuler, 371 So.2d 588 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), which we deem inapposite, was decided under section 61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1978). Section 61.13 has subsequently been amended. See Fla. Stat. § 61.13(2)(b)2.c (1987). In any event, Shuler is consistent with the subsequent amendment to section 61.13(2)(b)2.c (1987).

GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herndon v. Herndon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 13, 1991
575 So. 2d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Herndon v. Herndon

Case Details

Full title:ALAN D. HERNDON, APPELLANT, v. CHERYL A. HERNDON, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 13, 1991

Citations

575 So. 2d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)