From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 11, 2002
296 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90737

July 11, 2002.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Roberto Hernandez, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented in the form of the misbehavior report, the documentation relating to the positive laboratory test results, including the daily log, and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report and conducted the urinalysis testing (see, Matter of Barnwell v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 725, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 751; Matter of Rivera v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 754). Petitioner's assertion that various procedural errors violated his constitutional rights has been reviewed and found to be without merit. In particular, we find that it was not error for the Hearing Officer to deny petitioner's request to call as witnesses the Deputy Commissioner of Correctional Facility Operations and the Supervisor of Security at Elmira Correctional Facility. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that these individuals possessed any information relevant to the facts that gave rise to this proceeding nor did he show that he was in any way prejudiced by their absence (see, Matter of Nijman v. Goord, 294 A.D.2d 737 [May 16, 2002]; Matter of Blanche v. Selsky, 253 A.D.2d 944, 945, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 817). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's assertion of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 11, 2002
296 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERTO HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 11, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 677 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 727

Citing Cases

Tafari v. Fischer

Moreover, five correction officers who were present at the time of the incident testified at the hearing and…

In the Matter of Tafari v. McGinnis

The Hearing Officer made no determination that the denial of their testimony was necessary to promote…