From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Marin Bowl Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-03826 NC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-03826 NC

03-11-2013

JOSE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MARIN BOWL CORPORATION, JOHN MASBERG, and DOES 1-20, Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL


Re: Dkt. No. 19

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. In the event that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided that such motion is filed within 90 days of this order. All scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

Nathanael M. Cousins

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Marin Bowl Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 11, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-03826 NC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Marin Bowl Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MARIN BOWL CORPORATION, JOHN MASBERG, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-03826 NC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013)