From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman v. Village of Kiryas Joel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2005
19 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-04777.

June 20, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated March 30, 2004, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Solomon Rosengarten, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellants.

McCormick Turpin, Pearl River, N.Y. (Stephen J. Hubel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Cozier and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Michael Herman sustained injuries when he slipped and fell on ice on a sidewalk owned by the defendant, the Village of Kiryas Joel. In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant established that the plaintiffs failed to comply with its prior written notice statute ( see Tramontano v. County of Suffolk, 239 AD2d 407, 408). In opposition, the plaintiffs submitted vague, conclusory, and speculative evidence insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant created the dangerous condition that caused the injured plaintiff to fall as the result of an alleged negligent repair of the sidewalk ( see Nixdorf v. East Islip School Dist., 276 AD2d 759, 759-760; see also Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471, 474; Kiernan v. Thompson, 73 NY2d 840, 842; Gold v. County of Westchester, 15 AD3d 439). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendant.

The plaintiffs' remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

Herman v. Village of Kiryas Joel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 2005
19 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Herman v. Village of Kiryas Joel

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HERMAN et al., Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF KIRYAS JOEL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Petrocone v. Town of North Hempstead

s the claimant can establish that the municipality created the defect in question through an affirmative act…

Geslani v. County of Nassau

Where there is no evidence that the municipality received prior written notice of the defect, a town will not…