From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbert v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2018
162 A.D.3d 1454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

525956

06-28-2018

In the Matter of Marquis HERBERT, Petitioner, v. Donald VENETTOZZI, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Marquis Herbert, Stormville, petitioner pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Marquis Herbert, Stormville, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Further, to the extent that he seeks such relief, "petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination" ( Matter of Brown v. Annucci, 157 A.D.3d 1182, 1182, 67 N.Y.S.3d 507 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted] ). Accordingly, and inasmuch as petitioner otherwise has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Colon v. Annucci, 159 A.D.3d 1216, 1216, 69 N.Y.S.3d 842 [2018] ; Matter of Kennedy v. Annucci, 157 A.D.3d 1179, 1180, 67 N.Y.S.3d 504 [2017] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCarthy, J.P., Devine, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Herbert v. Venettozzi

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2018
162 A.D.3d 1454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Herbert v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Marquis HERBERT, Petitioner, v. Donald VENETTOZZI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2018

Citations

162 A.D.3d 1454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
75 N.Y.S.3d 920

Citing Cases

Williams v. Keyser

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all…

Watkins v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary…