Summary
finding that erroneous evidentiary rulings did not affect outcome of trial; therefore, errors were harmless
Summary of this case from Vickers v. ThomasOpinion
No. 3D99-666.
Opinion filed April 5, 2000.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Amy Steele Donner, Judge. LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 96-19784
Oscar Syger, for appellant.
Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder; Timothy Harrington and Stephen K. Katz, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
After carefully reviewing the record, we find that the alleged erroneous evidentiary ruling did not affect the outcome of the trial. Therefore, the error, if any, was harmless. § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1999); Katos v. Cushing, 601 So.2d 612, 613 (Fla.3d DCA 1992) (holding that in a civil case the "test for harmful error is whether, but for such error, a different result may have been reached.").
Affirmed.