From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heptinstall v. Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1877
76 N.C. 190 (N.C. 1877)

Opinion

(January Term, 1877.)

Homestead — Assessment.

Under Bat. Rev. ch. 55, § 20, the application for a re-assessment of a homestead by the Township Board of Trustees must be made before the sale of the excess by the Sheriff.

CIVIL ACTION tried at Fall Term, 1875, of HALIFAX Superior Court, before Watts, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants, execution issued thereon and the homestead of the judgment debtor was laid off. About six months after the sale of the excess by the Sheriff, the plaintiff becoming dissatisfied requested a re-appraisement and re-allotment of said homestead, and to that end applied for a peremptory mandamus to be directed to the Township Board of Trustees, the other defendants, which His Honor refused and the plaintiff appealed.

Messrs. Moore Gatling and E. Conigland, for the plaintiff.

No counsel for the defendants.


The statute is so plain as to leave no room for construction.

The application for re-assessment and allotment of homestead must be before the sale of the excess by the Sheriff. Bat. Rev. ch. 55. § 20.

No error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Heptinstall v. Perry

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1877
76 N.C. 190 (N.C. 1877)
Case details for

Heptinstall v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:J. W. HEPTINSTALL v. E. B. PERRY and others

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1877

Citations

76 N.C. 190 (N.C. 1877)

Citing Cases

Hartman v. Spiers

But one of the provisions of the act is, that the appeal must be taken before sale under execution of the…