From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Quicken Loans Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 28, 2006
Civil Case No. 04-40346 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 04-40346.

September 28, 2006


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This is a potential collective action for paid overtime, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Class Certification and Judicial Notice and Motion to Compel, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Wallace Capel, Jr. The Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation on August 18, 2006, recommending that Plaintiff's motion be granted in part and denied in part. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on September 5, 2006, and Plaintiff responded to the objections on September 19, 2006.

In their objections, Defendants first object to the recommendation to grant Plaintiff's motion to compel the production of names and addresses of current and past loan consultants. Defendants argue that this information should be provided to a third-party in order to facilitate notice, and not to Plaintiff. Plaintiff argues that this information should be produced to them, because it is proper discovery material. The Court finds Plaintiff's argument compelling, and accordingly, overrules Defendants' objections on this issue.

Also in their objections, Defendants request that Magistrate Judge Capel issue a revised or supplemental Report and Recommendation, addressing various questions concerning the specific language of the notice and the number of mailed notices permitted that Defendants believe need further clarity and explanation. Pursuant to this request, the Court consulted with Magistrate Judge Capel on the appropriate manner to proceed in these matters. Because the Court finds that the reasoning and conclusions of Magistrate Judge Capel to be sound, the Court will therefore accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and then remand the issues raised by Defendants concerning the specific language of the notice and the number of mailed notices permitted to Magistrate Judge Capel for a determination.

Accordingly, after having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's motion, and the applicable portions of the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [docket entry 278] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the opinion of this Court, and Plaintiff's motion [docket entry 213] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. In particular:

(1) Plaintiff's motion for conditional class certification is GRANTED.

(2) Plaintiff's request for equitable tolling is DENIED.

(3) Plaintiff's request that the Court compel the production of names and addresses of current and past loan consultants is GRANTED.

(4) The Court will facilitate judicial notice to potential class members to inform them of the action and to give them an opportunity to participate by opting in. In addition, corrective notices and notice of withdrawal forms should be sent out to all plaintiffs who have opted in the litigation. The issues raised by Defendants in their objections concerning the specific language of the notice and the number of mailed notices permitted are remanded to the Magistrate Judge for a determination.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henry v. Quicken Loans Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 28, 2006
Civil Case No. 04-40346 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Henry v. Quicken Loans Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RYAN C. HENRY, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 28, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 04-40346 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 28, 2006)

Citing Cases

Monroe v. FTS USA, LLC

This second step is a specific factual consideration of each individual claim to assure that it is…