From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 29, 2012
37 A.3d 745 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-29

STATE of Connecticut v. Ronald BROWN.

Timothy F. Costello, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Christopher Y. Duby, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Timothy F. Costello, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Christopher Y. Duby, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 140, 34 A.3d 1007 (AC 32597), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence?

“2. If the answer to question one is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the appropriate remedy was to remand the case for resentencing, rather than to vacate the defendant's guilty pleas?”


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 29, 2012
37 A.3d 745 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Ronald BROWN.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

37 A.3d 745 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 901

Citing Cases

State v. Brown

We granted the state's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following questions: (1) “Did the…