From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hempfield Township Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 1970
272 A.2d 729 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)

Opinion

November 13, 1970.

December 10, 1970.

Constitutional Law — Article IX of Pennsylvania Constitution — Municipalities — Annexation — Prior statutes pertaining to proceedings pending at time of adoption of new Article IX not repealed — Schedule, part of Article IX, applicable only to sections of Article IX, not to Acts of Assembly — Act of July 20, 1953, P.L. 550.

1. The new Article IX of the Pennsylvania Constitution did not repeal prior statutes pertaining to proceedings pending at the time of action by the electorate.

2. The Schedule made part of Article IX (which provides that this new article and the repeal of existing sections shall take effect on the date of approval by the electorate) applies only to sections of Article IX, and not to Acts of Assembly as well.

3. The repeal of statutes by new constitutional provisions must be clear and unambiguous.

4. In this case, it was Held that an annexation proceeding conducted under the Act of July 20, 1953, P.L. 550, was a pending proceeding at the time of adoption of the new Article IX and was not affected by it.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and CERCONE, JJ.

Appeal, No. 300, April T., 1970, from order of Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, July T., 1966, No. 16, in re Annexation to the City of Greensburg, of a portion of Hempfield Township, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, containing 185.44 acres, adjacent to the City of Greensburg. Order affirmed.

Proceedings upon petition for annexation to city of portion of township.

Robert M. Stefanon, for appellant.

Joseph B. Mitinger, for appellee.


Argued November 13, 1970.


Order entered approving annexation and exceptions thereto by township dismissed, opinion by McCORMICK, J. Exceptant, township, appealed.


From an order of the Quarter Sessions Court of Westmoreland County approving the annexation by the City of Greensburg of 185.44 acres of land in the adjoining Township of Hempfield, the Township has taken this appeal.

The only issue is whether Article IX of the Pennsylvania Constitution as adopted by the electorate at the election held April 23, 1968, repealed the Act of July 20, 1953, P.L. 550, 53 P. S. § 67501-67508, under which these proceedings were conducted, and for that reason nullified them. This question in a slightly different form and as applied to another statute was before us in East Donegal Township Annexation Case, 213 Pa. Super. 76, 245 A.2d 706 (1968), and in Lower Macungie Township Annexation Case (No. 1), 213 Pa. Super. 313, 248 A.2d 58 (1968), allocatur refused, 217 Pa. Super. lxiv, and Lower Macungie Township Annexation Case (No. 2), 213 Pa. Super. 321, 248 A.2d 63 (1968), allocatur refused, 217 Pa. Super. lxiv. Therein we held that said Article IX did not repeal prior applicable statutes. However, appellant now urges us to reconsider the question in the light of the Schedule made part of said Article IX which provides, "This new article and the repeal of existing sections shall take effect on the date of approval by the electorate, except . . ." Appellant contends that this applies not only to sections of Article IX but to Acts of Assembly as well. We do not agree.

The Schedule does not specifically refer to statutes and in enumerating the excepted sections it makes reference only to sections of Article IX. In the cases we previously cited we said that the repeal of statutes by new constitutional provisions must be clear and unambiguous. We adhere to this principle and in applying it conclude that the Schedule relied on by appellant does not support its contention. We hold that the Schedule refers only to sections of Article IX.

The present proceedings were authorized by an ordinance of the City of Greensburg enacted July 11, 1966, and were not affected by the adoption of Article IX on April 23, 1968. Lower Macungie Township Annexation Case (No. 1), supra. In the three cases previously cited the proceedings were completed except for disposition of pending appeals. In the present case an order approving the annexation had been entered on July 26, 1967, but on appeal we vacated that order on December 14, 1967, Hempfield Township Annexation Case, 211 Pa. Super. 180, 237 A.2d 244, and remanded the case to the lower court for further proceedings, which were pending at the time of the election, and resulted in a new order approving the annexation dated July 30, 1968.

This difference in the progress of the proceeding does not affect the result. This was a pending proceeding at the time of the election and was not affected by it.


Order affirmed.

[*] Reporter's Note: The first page of these Memorandum Reports is arbitrarily numbered 701 in order that these cases may be paged finally in the Advance Reports and included currently in the Table of Cases Reported.


Summaries of

Hempfield Township Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 1970
272 A.2d 729 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
Case details for

Hempfield Township Appeal

Case Details

Full title:Hempfield Township Appeal (No. 1)

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 10, 1970

Citations

272 A.2d 729 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1970)
272 A.2d 729

Citing Cases

Youngwood Borough Annexation Case

OPINION BY MONTGOMERY, J.: The only question which needs our consideration is governed by our decision to be…

Hempfield Township v. Greensburg

The appellant argues that the word "sections" in the Schedule means sections of legislation. This contention…