From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemingway v. U.S. Bank Natl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-01989.

Decided March 1, 2004.

In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated February 21, 2002, which denied her motion to stay her eviction from the subject premises and to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the premises dated February 16, 2000.

Gearlene Hemingway, Yonkers, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Adam E. Mikolay, P.C., Westbury, N.Y. (Mario B. Mikelinich, P.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SONDRA MILLER, J.P., HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant's arguments regarding the judgment of foreclosure were previously determined in a prior foreclosure action commenced against the appellant and resolved against her and thus are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel ( see O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353; Matter of Kleiger-Brown v. Brown, 306 A.D.2d 482; Mercury Capital Corp. v. Sheperds Beach, 305 A.D.2d 471). The motion for a stay and vacatur based on these arguments was providently denied.

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.

S. MILLER, J.P., H. MILLER, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hemingway v. U.S. Bank Natl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 2004
5 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Hemingway v. U.S. Bank Natl

Case Details

Full title:GEARLENE HEMINGWAY, appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 536